The UK's largest and most visited divorce site.
Modern, convenient and affordable services.

We've helped over 1 million people since 2007.

 
Click this button for details of our
email, phone nbr and free consultations.
 

Having a Barrister and self rep?

  • TurboB
  • TurboB's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
15 Jan 15 #453799 by TurboB
Topic started by TurboB
Hi all,

Heading towards Final Hearing. I want to use a barrister, and have a lawyer engaged at the moment.

If i decided to dispense with the services of my lawyer, and handled all the admin and paperwork for the FH myself, could I still engage and use a barrister to represent me at the FH?

If so, how would this be done? direct liaison with the chambers?

Ta

  • rubytuesday
  • rubytuesday's Avatar
  • Moderator
  • Moderator
More
15 Jan 15 #453800 by rubytuesday
Reply from rubytuesday
Yes - you can engage a direct access barrister. However, it''s worth re-thinking your idea to dispense with your sols at such a crucial time in the proceedings.

  • Man38
  • Man38's Avatar
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
28 Jan 15 #454734 by Man38
Reply from Man38
Some of the chambers say on their website which barristers are direct access and how to engage on this basis. Generally you make a call to the clerk.

  • TurboB
  • TurboB's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
29 Jan 15 #454780 by TurboB
Reply from TurboB
Thanks for the heads up.

I have just noticed that the barrister that my lawyer recommended is part of the Direct Access scheme.

As he has already been engaged, but i''m yet to have a conference with him, would it be wise to approach him also on a Direct Access basis?

How significant would the cost savings be?

Ta

  • TurboB
  • TurboB's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
30 Mar 15 #458892 by TurboB
Reply from TurboB
Hi,

Is anyone able to advise whether there is a difference between the rates a barrister uses between direct access and engaged through a solicitor?

Ta

  • .Charles
  • .Charles's Avatar
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
30 Mar 15 #458897 by .Charles
Reply from .Charles
In my experience the rates are higher. This is due to the barrister having to spend extra preparation time getting to grips with a case which has no succinct summary that would normally be provided by a solicitor.

The litigant in person will of course save the cost of instructing a solicitor though so it is swings and roundabouts.

Charles

  • TurboB
  • TurboB's Avatar Posted by
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
30 Mar 15 #458907 by TurboB
Reply from TurboB
Thanks Charles.

Moderators: wikivorce teamrubytuesdaydukeyhadenoughnowTetsSheziLinda SheridanForsetiMitchumWhiteRoseLostboy67WYSPECIALBubblegum11

Do you need help sorting out a fair financial settlement?

Our consultant service offers expert advice and support to help you reach agreement on a fair financial settlement quickly, and for less than a quarter of the cost of using a traditional high street solicitor.

 

We can help you to get a fair financial settlement.

Negotiate a fair deal from £299

Helping you negotiate a fair financial settlement with your spouse (or their solicitor) without going to court.


Financial Mediation from £399

Financial mediation is a convenient and inexpensive way to agree on a fair financial settlement.


Consent Orders from £950

This legally binding agreement defines how assets (e.g. properties and pensions) are to be divided.


Court Support from £299

Support for people who have to go to court to get a fair divorce financial settlement without a solicitor.